Open Research Newcastle
Browse

Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms relate to risk of adenomatous polyps in a sex-specific manner

Download (286.27 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2025-05-09, 12:33 authored by Emma Beckett, Katherine Le Gras, Charlotte Martin, Lyndell Boyd, Xiaowei Ng, Konsta Duesing, Zoe YatesZoe Yates, Martin VeyseyMartin Veysey, Mark LucockMark Lucock
Vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene polymorphisms may influence risk for adenomatous polyps (AP), a benign precursor to colon cancer, via modulation of vitamin D sensitive pathways, including cell proliferation and differentiation. However, results have been mixed and any association remains contentious. Failure to clinically exclude the presence of (AP in control cohorts may contribute to the lack of consensus. Therefore, we assessed the role of the FokI, BsmI, ApaI, and TaqI VDR polymorphisms in modifying risk for AP, adjusting for a range of dietary and lifestyle variables. Blood was collected from colonoscopy patients (n = 258) and VDR polymorphisms assessed by restriction fragment length polymorphism. Dietary habits were estimated from food frequency questionnaires. Odds ratios for AP were calculated by genotype, stratified by sex, and adjusted for age, lifestyle, and dietary factors. FokI was associated with modified risk for AP in males, whereas the BsmI/ApaI/TaqI haplotype was associated with modified risk in females. No interaction was found between VDR variants and vitamin D intake. This study offers novel insight into the potential for VDR genetics to contribute to risk for AP and is the first to demonstrate a sex-specific relationship between these polymorphisms and risk for AP.

History

Journal title

Nutrition and Cancer

Volume

68

Issue

2

Pagination

193-200

Publisher

Routledge

Language

  • en, English

College/Research Centre

Faculty of Health and Medicine

School

School of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy

Rights statement

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Nutrition and Cancer on 23/02/2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/01635581.2016.1142584

Usage metrics

    Publications

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC