Open Research Newcastle
Browse

Using nominal group technique to develop a consensus derived model for peer review of teaching across a multi-school faculty

Download (161.76 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2025-05-09, 07:27 authored by Tracy BurrowsTracy Burrows, Naomi Findlay, Chloe Killen, Shane E. Dempsey, Sharyn Hunter, Pauline ChiarelliPauline Chiarelli, Suzanne SnodgrassSuzanne Snodgrass
This paper describes the development of a peer review of teaching model for the Faculty of Health at the University of Newcastle, Australia. The process involved using the nominal group technique to engage Faculty academic staff to consider seven key decision points that informed the development of the peer review of teaching model. Use of the consensus based nominal group technique established collegial discussion and networking among participants, and has expanded the discussion within the Faculty about peer review of teaching. Although the academics come from a diverse multi-school and multi-program Faculty, there was high levels of consensus on the structure and process of the developed peer review of teaching model.

History

Journal title

Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice

Volume

8

Issue

2

Publisher

Centre for Educational Development and Interactive Resources

Language

  • en, English

College/Research Centre

Faculty of Health

School

School of Health Sciences

Usage metrics

    Publications

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC