posted on 2025-05-10, 13:26authored byScott James Fitzpatrick
As a work of interdisciplinary dialogue, Mary Jean Walker (2012) successfully straddles the fields of neuroscience, cognitive science, and social psychology in addressing key questions on the role, value, and truth claims of narrative as a mode of self-understanding. However, in the context of neuroethical debate her article raises a set of parallel conceptual and epistemological concerns that confuse and conflate what it is to tell stories. I suggest that Walker’s
perspective is philosophically limited in that she does not explicitly acknowledge narrative as a discursive activity. In this, Walker is not alone—the neurosciences and cognitive sciences frequently make assumptions about what narrative is and what it is not. This is significant because a theory of narrative that is blind to narrative as a discursive activity risks diminishing important social contexts involved in the construction of human self-understanding and truth.
History
Journal title
AJOB Neuroscience
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pagination
80-81
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Language
en, English
College/Research Centre
Faculty of Science and Information Technology
School
School of Psychology
Rights statement
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in AJOB Neuroscience on 08/10/2012, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/21507740.2012.721452