'Generation' is a term usually deployed in two problematic ways. It is a key trope for use in marketing. In connection, but more troubling, it is a form of symbolic violence in mainstream media and political discourses where an array of generalisations, stereotypes and labels are mobilised to pathologise structural problems as individual deficiencies - lazy students bludging off their parents; disloyal careerists; technologically dependent, mindless consumers; socially irresponsible, politically apathetic individuals - and so on. By using socio-histoirical definition of generation, where it denotes how people born at a similar time face similar economic, social and cultural norms that do not necessarily parlay into common values and experiences, Andres and Wyn skilfully show how two traditional contours of inequality - class and gender - still play key roles in shaping the very different transitions of young people and do much to destroy these governmentalised caricatures.
History
Journal title
Youth Studies Australia
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pagination
69-70
Publisher
Australian Clearinghouse for Youth Studies
Language
en, English
College/Research Centre
Faculty of Education and Arts
School
School of Humanities and Social Science
Rights statement
Copyright to this version is retained by ACYS and this version is archived with the permission of ACYS.