Open Research Newcastle
Browse

The level of confidence and responsibility accepted by Australian radiation therapists in developing plans and implementing treatment

Download (183 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2025-05-11, 22:37 authored by Shane E. Dempsey, M. Burr
The purpose of this research was to assess (i) how confident Radiation Therapists (RTs) are in developing a series of plans that have increasing levels of difficulty, and (ii) the level of responsibility that they are willing to accept in relation to these treatments being implemented without the Radiation Oncologist (RO) reviewing or countersigning the plan. A self-administered questionnaire was designed around a set of six clinical planning scenarios demonstrating increasing levels of difficulty. Two hundred and three Radiation Therapists returned a completed questionnaire. All RTs indicated that they were confident to complete all the plans regardless of difficulty (p < 0.0001) except for newly qualified RTs in their first year of practice who indicated a lack of confidence with the most difficult case only. Contrary to the high levels of confidence, RTs overall were only willing to accept responsibility for implementing treatment for the two basic level scenarios (p < 0.0001). To gauge the clinical usefulness of this finding a clinical centre audit was conducted that indicated that basic level procedures account for around 30–40% of a department's workload. RTs indicated a number of issues as barriers to accepting responsibility for more advanced work.

History

Journal title

Radiography

Volume

15

Issue

2

Pagination

139-145

Publisher

Elsevier

Language

  • en, English

College/Research Centre

Faculty of Health

School

School of Health Sciences

Usage metrics

    Publications

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC