Open Research Newcastle
Browse

Prevalence of appropriate colorectal cancer screening and preferences for receiving screening advice among people attending outpatient clinics

Download (103.31 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2025-05-08, 20:55 authored by Natalie Dodd, Elise MansfieldElise Mansfield, Mariko CareyMariko Carey, Christopher OldmeadowChristopher Oldmeadow
Objective: To examine among people attending outpatient clinics aged 50–74 at average risk of colorectal cancer (CRC): 1) The proportion who report: a) faecal occult blood test (FOBT) within the past two years; and b) colonoscopy within the past five years, including the reasons for undergoing colonoscopy; 2) characteristics associated with under‐screening; 3) For those who are under‐screened, the proportion who are: a) willing to receive help and the acceptability of different methods of receiving help, and; b) unwilling to receive help and reasons for this. Methods: Cross‐sectional survey of 197 participants attending a major regional hospital in New South Wales, Australia. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine correlates of under‐screening. Results: A total of 59% reported either FOBT in the past two years or colonoscopy in the past five years. Of those reporting colonoscopy in the past five years, 21% were potentially over‐screened. Males were more likely than females to be under‐screened. Of those under‐screened (41%), fewer than half were willing to receive screening advice. Conclusions and implications for public health: A significant proportion of people attending outpatient clinics are under‐screened for CRC, with some people also over‐screened. There is a need to explore strategies to overcome both under‐ and over‐screening.

History

Journal title

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health

Volume

42

Issue

4

Pagination

334-339

Publisher

Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Asia

Language

  • en, English

College/Research Centre

Faculty of Health and Medicine

School

School of Medicine and Public Health

Rights statement

© 2018 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

Usage metrics

    Publications

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC