posted on 2025-05-09, 21:00authored byMagnus Ekström, Pei Zhi Li, Hayley LewthwaiteHayley Lewthwaite, Jean Bourbeau, Wan C. Tan, Linus Schiöler, Andrew Brotto, Michael K. Stickland, Dennis Jensen
Rationale: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is the gold standard to evaluate exertional breathlessness, a common and disabling symptom. However, interpretation of breathlessness responses to CPET is limited by a scarcity of normative data. Objectives: We aimed to develop normative reference equations for breathlessness intensity (Borg 0-10 category-ratio [CR10]) response in men and women aged ≥40 years during CPET, in relation to power output (W), rate of oxygen uptake (V'O2), and minute ventilation (V'E). Methods: Analysis of ostensibly healthy people aged ≥40 years undergoing a symptom-limited incremental cycle CPET (10 W/min) in the Canadian Cohort Obstructive Lung Disease (CanCOLD) study. Participants had <5 pack-years smoking, normal lung function and exercise capacity. The probability of each Borg CR10 breathlessness intensity rating by W, V'O2 or V'E (as absolute or relative value [% of predicted max]) was predicted using ordinal multinomial logistic regression. Model performance was evaluated by fit, calibration, discrimination (c-statistic), and externally validated in an independent sample (n=86) of healthy Canadian adults. Results: We included 156 participants (43% women) from CanCOLD; mean age 65 (range 42-91) years, mean body mass index 26.3 (SD 3.8) kg/m2. Reference equations were developed for females and males separately, accounting for age and/or body mass. Model performance was high across all equations, including in the validation sample (c-statistic males: 0.81-0.92; females: 0.81-0.96). Conclusions: Normative reference equations are provided to compare exertional breathlessness intensity ratings between individuals or groups, and to identify and quantify abnormal breathlessness responses (score > upper limit of normal) during CPET.
History
Journal title
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pagination
56-67
Publisher
American Thoracic Society
Language
en, English
College/Research Centre
College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing
School
School of Nursing and Midwifery
Rights statement
This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License 4.0.