Interpretation of items on the AUDIT questionnaire

Aim: To test for the possibility that tertiary students misinterpret certain items on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). Method: Responses to alternative question wordings were compared with responses to standard items. Results: Alterations to items 5 and 9, so that consequences of drinking epitomised in these items were more specifically defined, resulted in markedly different response distributions to the item but the total AUDIT score was not changed Conclusion: Caution is necessary before using individual AUDIT items as measures of consequences in population surveys, and the possibility of false positives in total scores should be born in mind.