posted on 2025-05-11, 12:56authored byEmmett Stinson
This article responds to an ongoing public debate about whether Australian book reviewing is 'too nice', which started in the literary journal Kill Your Darlings in 2010 and has continued in other literary publications. It takes up Ben Etherington's claim that 'too nice' reviewing is characterised by the 'compliment sandwich' in which critique is surrounded by mollifying praise. It offers a 'distant reading' of two years of fiction reviews in the Australian Book Review, applying a manual appraisal analysis to demonstrate that book reviews in Australia's flagship reviewing publication do often adhere to the compliment-sandwich form. The article then returns to the question of 'too nice' reviewing, and applies a modified Bourdieusian analysis to examine how reviewing debates have served as proxies for larger disputes between institutions and interlocutors in the literary field.
History
Journal title
Australian Humanities Review
Issue
60
Pagination
108-126
Publisher
Australian National University
Language
en, English
College/Research Centre
Faculty of Education and Arts
School
School of Humanities and Social Science
Rights statement
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License