posted on 2025-05-10, 15:36authored byCatherine Jane Segan, Sarah Maddox, Ron Borland
Introduction: Few homeless programs offer smoking cessation treatment. This study examined the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of a smoking cessation treatment model delivered by staff of a homeless persons’ program. Methods: Fourteen nurses from Melbourne’s Royal District Nursing Service Homeless Persons’ Program recruited 49 clients into a 12-week program offering weekly nurse-delivered smoking cessation appointments with intermittent carbon monoxide measurements, doctor-prescribed free nicotine patch, bupropion or varenicline, and Quitline phone support. Surveys were completed at program enrolment, end of program (EoP, 3 months) and 6 months post-enrolment. Results: Clients attended on average 6.7 nurse-delivered appointments. Most used pharmacotherapy (69%, n = 34) and Quitline (61%, n = 30, average 8.4 calls among users). Using all-cases analyses 29% had made a quit attempt by EoP; 24-hour point prevalence abstinence rates were 6% at EoP and 4% at 6 months (no participants achieved sustained cessation), and 29% reported 50% consumption reduction at 6 months, the latter positively associated with increased Quitline use. Tobacco consumption and money spent on tobacco halved by EoP with similar levels maintained at 6 months. Discarded butt smoking reduced. Using within-subjects analyses, all participants reported either the same or less symptoms of anxiety at EoP compared to baseline and 92% reported the same or less depressive symptoms. Conclusions: Integrating nurse support with readily accessible cessation interventions (government subsidized pharmacotherapy plus Quitline) was feasible and acceptable. While quit rates were low, treatment benefits included harm-reduction (reduced consumption and butt smoking), significant financial savings, and psychological benefits (improved or stable mood).
Funding
NHMRC
359279
History
Journal title
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Volume
17
Issue
8
Pagination
996-1001
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Language
en, English
College/Research Centre
Faculty of Health and Medicine
School
Centre for Rural and Remote Mental Health
Rights statement
This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in the Nicotine & Tobacco Research following peer review. The version of the above record is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntv062.