Open Research Newcastle
Browse

Exploring health literacy and preferences for risk communication among medical oncology patients

Download (1.11 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2025-05-10, 15:25 authored by Mariko CareyMariko Carey, Anne Herrmann, Alix HallAlix Hall, Elise MansfieldElise Mansfield, Kristy FakesKristy Fakes
Objective: To explore adult medical oncology outpatients' understanding of and preferences for the format of health risk information. Methods Two surveys, one assessing sociodemographic characteristics and a second survey examining perceptions of risk information. Results Of the 361 (74%) consenting patients, 210 completed at least one question on risk communication. 17% to 65% of patients understood numeric risk information, depending on the format of the information. More than 50% of people interpreted a "very good" chance of remission as greater than 80%, greater than 90% or 100%. The most preferred format of information was in both words and numbers (38% to 43%) followed by words alone (28% to 30%). Conclusion Numeric risk information is understood by 17% to 65% of respondents, depending on the format. Interpretation of verbal risk information is highly variable, posing a risk of misunderstanding. Provision of information in both words and numbers may assist in aiding comprehension.

Funding

NHMRC

1010536

History

Journal title

PLoS ONE

Volume

13

Issue

9

Article number

e0203988

Publisher

Public Library of Science

Language

  • en, English

College/Research Centre

Faculty of Health and Medicine

School

School of Medicine and Public Health

Rights statement

© 2018 Carey et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Usage metrics

    Publications

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC