posted on 2025-05-10, 23:24authored byMichael J. Ostwald
In the last decade, the rise of sophisticated software tools has enabled a growing number of designers to experiment with new processes for the creation of architectural form. Several of these processes, which are loosely grouped under the rubric ‘auto-generative’, rely on the computer to evolve extraordinary biomorphic or topographic forms. In the years since the rise of this approach, prominent members of the architectural community have embraced the computer-generated buildings produced in this way and praised them as being the products of an innately ethical or moral design process. This supposition is tested through a critical textual analysis of several high-profile architects' statements and is focused exclusively on accounts of the design process and not on the buildings that are produced in this way. A three-part conceptual framework is developed for the ethical analysis of a creative or constructive process. Evidence is used selectively to interrogate the claims made about this movement from a moral or an ethical standpoint.
History
Journal title
Building Research and Information
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pagination
390-400
Publisher
Routledge
Language
en, English
College/Research Centre
Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment
School
School of Architecture and Built Environment
Rights statement
This is an electronic version of an article published in Building Research and Information Vol. 38, Issue 4, p. 390-400. Building Research and Information is available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/openurl?genre=article&issn=0961-3218&volume=38&issue=4&spage=390