Open Research Newcastle
Browse

Equal or equitable? The role of flexibility within online education

Download (314.4 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2025-05-09, 18:16 authored by Catherine StoneCatherine Stone, Elizabeth Freeman, Janet Dyment, Tracey Muir, Naomi Milthorpe
Online study is generally associated with the terms flexible and flexibility. Many students choose to study online specifically for the flexibility that is offered, hoping they can combine their studies with multiple other responsibilities in their lives. For students living in regional and rural areas, such flexibility can be even more important, given the additional difficulties they face in accessing campus facilities. While a flexible learning environment has the potential to contribute positively towards equity in higher education, this equity can be compromised when university policies and processes that have been designed for on-campus students are applied equally to online students. This paper examines the experiences of a group of regional and rural Education students who have chosen to study online, to a large extent because of online learning’s promised flexibility. Their experiences demonstrate that equal treatment may in fact undermine flexibility and result in an inequitable student experience.

History

Journal title

Australian and International Journal of Rural Education

Volume

29

Issue

2

Pagination

26-40

Publisher

Society for the Provision of Education in Rural Australia (SPERA)

Language

  • en, English

College/Research Centre

Faculty of Education and Arts

School

School of Humanities and Social Science

Rights statement

© 2019 Australian and International Journal of Rural Education. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.