Open Research Newcastle
Browse

Efficacy and toxicity of antihypertensive pharmacotherapy relative to effective dose 50

Download (530.91 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2025-05-11, 16:26 authored by Simon DimmittSimon Dimmitt, Hans G. Stampfer, Jennifer MartinJennifer Martin, Robin E. Ferner
Antihypertensive drugs have usually been approved at doses near the top of their respective dose-response curves. Efficacy plateaus but adverse drug reactions (ADRs), such as falls, cerebral or renal ischaemia, increase as dose is increased, especially in older patients with comorbidities. ADRs reduce adherence and may be difficult to ascertain reliably. Higher doses have generally not been shown to reduce total mortality, which provides a summary of efficacy and safety. Weight loss and other lifestyle measures are essential and may be sufficient treatment in many young and low risk patients. Most antihypertensive drug lower systolic blood pressure by around 10 mmHg, which reduces stroke and heart failure by about a quarter. Clinical trials have not been designed to demonstrate specific blood pressure treatment thresholds and targets, which are mostly extrapolated from epidemiology. Mean population oral effective dose 50 may be the most appropriate dose at which to commence antihypertensive drugs. The dose can then be titrated up if greater efficacy is demonstrated, or lowered if ADRs develop. Lower dose combination therapy may best balance benefit and harms with fewer ADRs and additive, potentially synergistic, efficacy.

History

Journal title

British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

Volume

85

Issue

10

Pagination

2218-2227

Publisher

Wiley-Blackwell

Language

  • en, English

College/Research Centre

Faculty of Health and Medicine

School

School of Medicine and Public Health

Rights statement

This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Dimmit, S. B., Stampfer, H. G. & Martin, H. G. et al. (2019) Efficacy and toxicity of antihypertensive pharmacotherapy relative to effective dose 50, British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Vol. 85 (10) p. 2218-2227 which has been published in final form at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bcp.14033. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.

Usage metrics

    Publications

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC