posted on 2025-05-09, 10:48authored byAmi EidelsAmi Eidels, Kathryn Ryan, Paul Williams, Daniel Algom
The presence of the Stroop effect betrays the fact that the carrier words were read in the face of instructions to ignore them and to respond to the target ink colors. In this study, we probed the nature of this involuntary reading by comparing color performance with that in a new forced-reading Stroop task in which responding is strictly contingent on reading each and every word. We found larger Stroop effects in the forced-reading task than in the classic Stroop task and concluded that words are processed to a shallower level in the Stroop task than they are in routine voluntary reading. The results show that the two modes of word processing differ in systematic ways and are conductive to qualitatively different representations. These results can pose a challenge to the strongly automatic view of word reading in the Stroop task.
Funding
ARC
DP120102907
History
Journal title
Experimental Psychology
Volume
61
Issue
5
Pagination
385-393
Publisher
Hogrefe Publishing
Language
en, English
College/Research Centre
Faculty of Science and Information Technology
School
School of Psychology
Rights statement
This article does not exactly replicate the final version published in the journal "Experimental Psychology”. It is not a copy of the original published article and is not suitable for citation.