Open Research Newcastle
Browse

Cumulative live birth rates among gestational surrogates in altruistic surrogacy arrangements

Download (714.24 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2025-05-11, 17:51 authored by Jutharat Attawet, Alex Wang, Zhuoyang Li, Louise Johnson, Karin Hammarberg, Elizabeth SullivanElizabeth Sullivan
Understanding the likelihood of a live birth is important for fertility treatment planning, particularly when one cycle fails and further treatment may be contemplated. This study aims to estimate the chance of live birth among gestational surrogates undergoing altruistic surrogacy arrangements between 2009 and 2016 in Victoria, Australia. A total of 81 gestational surrogates with 170 embryo transfer cycles were included. Of the 170 embryo transfer cycles, the majority were single embryo transfers (SETs; 97.1%), using frozen/thawed embryos (97.6%) which had been fertilized by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (77.6%). The cumulative live birth rate was 23.5% (95% CI, 15.6-33.8%) after the first cycle and increased to 50.6% (95% CI, 40.0-61.2%) after the sixth cycle. Of the 41 deliveries, 40 were singletons and one was a twin delivery. Two of the 42 deliveries were preterm, two were low birthweight and one was small for gestational age. The findings imply that surrogacy treatment can be offered up to six consecutive embryo transfer cycles to gestational surrogates. SET is encouraged in surrogacy practice to improve perinatal outcomes. These estimates can be used in counselling and decision-making for intended parents and gestational surrogates to continue a surrogacy treatment and informing public policy on assisted reproductive technology treatment.

History

Journal title

Human Fertility

Volume

25

Issue

2

Pagination

329-336

Publisher

Taylor & Francis

Language

  • en, English

College/Research Centre

Faculty of Health and Medicine

School

School of Medicine and Public Health

Rights statement

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Human Fertility on 23/07/2020, available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14647273.2020.1794062.

Usage metrics

    Publications

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC