posted on 2025-05-08, 20:49authored byChristoph Antons
As with litigation involving its predecessor Napster, cases involving the Australian based P2P service Kazaa and its US licensees Grokster and Morpheus required from the courts to balance the legitimate interests of the computer industry and the public in new and advanced technologies on the one hand and of so-called "content providers" of the media and entertainment industry on the other hand. The article examines, how US and Australian courts have approached this task and, in spite of differences in the legal frameworks of the two countries, have reached similar conclusions.
History
Journal title
Computer Law Review International
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pagination
70-76
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Language
en, English
College/Research Centre
Faculty of Business and Law
School
School of Law and Justice
Rights statement
The final publication is available at www.degruyter.com.