Open Research Newcastle
Browse

Context matters: using an Evidence to Decision (EtD) framework to develop and encourage uptake of opioid deprescribing guideline recommendations at the point-of-care

Download (467.09 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2025-05-11, 20:41 authored by Aili V. Langford, Lisa Bero, Chung-Wei Christine Lin, Fiona M. Blyth, Jason N. Doctor, Simon HollidaySimon Holliday, Yun-Hee Jeon, Joanna C. Moullin, Bridin Murnion, Suzanne Nielsen, Jonathan Penm, Emily Reeve, Sharon Reid, Janet Wale, Rawa Osman, Danijela Gnjidic, Carl R. Schneider
Objectives: To describe the development and use of an Evidence to Decision (EtD) framework when formulating recommendations for the Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline for Deprescribing Opioid Analgesics. Study Design and Setting: Evidence was derived from an overview of systematic reviews and qualitative studies conducted with healthcare professionals and people who take opioids for pain. A multidisciplinary guideline development group conducted extensive EtD framework review and iterative refinement to ensure that guideline recommendations captured contextual factors relevant to the guideline target setting and audience. Results: The guideline development group considered and accounted for the complexities of opioid deprescribing at the individual and health system level, shaping recommendations and practice points to facilitate point-of-care use. Stakeholders exhibited diverse preferences, beliefs, and values. This variability, low certainty of evidence, and system-level policies and funding models impacted the strength of the generated recommendations, resulting in the formulation of four ‘conditional’ recommendations. Conclusion: The context within which evidence-based recommendations are considered, as well as the political and health system environment, can contribute to the success of recommendation implementation. Use of an EtD framework allowed for the development of implementable recommendations relevant at the point-of-care through consideration of limitations of the evidence and relevant contextual factors.

History

Journal title

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Volume

165

Issue

January 2024

Article number

111204

Publisher

Elsevier

Language

  • en, English

College/Research Centre

College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing

School

School of Medicine and Public Health

Rights statement

© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Usage metrics

    Publications

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC