Open Research Newcastle
Browse

Comparing the effects of three cognitive tasks on indicators of mental fatigue

Download (10.68 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2025-05-11, 16:19 authored by Mitchell SmithMitchell Smith, Rifai Chai, Hung T. Nguyen, Samuele M. Marcora, Aaron J. Coutts
This investigation assessed the impact of three cognitively demanding tasks on cognitive performance, subjective, and physiological indicators of mental fatigue. Following familiarization, participants completed four testing sessions, separated by 48 h. During each session, participants watched a 45-min emotionally neutral documentary (control) or completed one of the following computer tasks: Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT); AX-Continuous Performance Test (AX-CPT); or Stroop Task. Mental fatigue was assessed before and at regular periods for 60 min following the 45-min treatments. Cognitive performance was assessed using 3-min PVT, and task performance. Subjective assessments were conducted using the Brunel Mood Scale, and visual analog scales (VAS). Physiological indicators of mental fatigue included electroencephalography (EEG), and heart rate variability (HRV). Subjective ratings of mental fatigue increased from pre to 0-min post in all-treatments, but not the documentary (p < 0.05). Subjective fatigue (VAS) remained higher (p < 0.05) than pretreatment values for 20-, 50-, and 60-min following the PVT, Stroop, and AX-CPT respectively. The cognitively demanding tasks had unclear effects on 3-min PVT, EEG, and HRV assessments. Tasks requiring response inhibition appear to induce fatigue for longer durations than a simple vigilance task. Simple VAS appear to be the most practical method for assessing mental fatigue.

History

Journal title

Journal of Psychology

Volume

153

Issue

8

Pagination

759-783

Publisher

Routledge

Language

  • en, English

College/Research Centre

Faculty of Science

School

School of Environmental and Life Sciences

Rights statement

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in the Journal of Psychology on 12/06/2019, available online: https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2019.1611530.

Usage metrics

    Publications

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC