posted on 2025-05-09, 07:55authored byJonathan M. Borwein, Richard E. Crandall
Mathematics abounds in terms that are in frequent use yet are rarely made precise. Two such are rigorous proof and closed form (absent the technical use within differential algebra). If a rigorous proof is “that which ‘convinces’ the appropriate audience,” then a closed form is “that which looks ‘fundamental’ to the requisite consumer.” In both cases, this is a community-varying and epoch-dependent notion. What was a compelling proof in 1810 may well not be now; what is a fine closed form in 2010 may have been anathema a century ago. In this article we are intentionally informal as befits a topic that intrinsically has no one “right” answer. Let us begin by sampling the Web for various approaches to informal definitions of “closed form”.
History
Journal title
Notices of the American Mathematical Society
Volume
60
Issue
1
Pagination
50-65
Publisher
American Mathematical Society (AMS)
Language
en, English
College/Research Centre
Faculty of Science and Information Technology
School
Centre for Computer Assisted Research Mathematics and its Applications (CARMA)
Rights statement
First published in Notices of the American Mathematical Society in Vol. 60, No. 1. 2013, published by the American Mathematical Society