Open Research Newcastle
Browse

Closed forms: what they are and why we care

Download (5.02 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2025-05-09, 07:55 authored by Jonathan M. Borwein, Richard E. Crandall
Mathematics abounds in terms that are in frequent use yet are rarely made precise. Two such are rigorous proof and closed form (absent the technical use within differential algebra). If a rigorous proof is “that which ‘convinces’ the appropriate audience,” then a closed form is “that which looks ‘fundamental’ to the requisite consumer.” In both cases, this is a community-varying and epoch-dependent notion. What was a compelling proof in 1810 may well not be now; what is a fine closed form in 2010 may have been anathema a century ago. In this article we are intentionally informal as befits a topic that intrinsically has no one “right” answer. Let us begin by sampling the Web for various approaches to informal definitions of “closed form”.

History

Journal title

Notices of the American Mathematical Society

Volume

60

Issue

1

Pagination

50-65

Publisher

American Mathematical Society (AMS)

Language

  • en, English

College/Research Centre

Faculty of Science and Information Technology

School

Centre for Computer Assisted Research Mathematics and its Applications (CARMA)

Rights statement

First published in Notices of the American Mathematical Society in Vol. 60, No. 1. 2013, published by the American Mathematical Society

Usage metrics

    Publications

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC