posted on 2025-05-11, 18:22authored byKaitlyn Hair, Emily S. Sena, Emma Wilson, Gillian Currie, Malcolm Macleod, Zsanett Bahor, Chris Sena, Can Ayder, Jing Liao, Ezgi Tanriver Ayder, Joly Ghanawi, Anthony Tsang, Anne Collins, Alice Carstairs, Sarah Antar, Katie Drax, Kleber Neves, Thomas Ottavi, Yoke Yue Chow, David Henry, Rebecca HoodRebecca Hood
Throughout the global coronavirus pandemic, we have seen an unprecedented volume of COVID-19 researchpublications. This vast body of evidence continues to grow, making it difficult for research users to keep up with the pace of evolving research findings. To enable the synthesis of this evidence for timely use by researchers, policymakers, and other stakeholders, we developed an automated workflow to collect, categorise, and visualise the evidence from primary COVID-19 research studies. We trained a crowd of volunteer reviewers to annotate studies by relevance to COVID-19, study objectives, and methodological approaches. Using these human decisions, we are training machine learning classifiers and applying text-mining tools to continually categorise the findings and evaluate the quality of COVID-19 evidence.
History
Journal title
Journal of the European Association for Health Information and Libraries
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pagination
21-26
Publisher
European Association for Health Information and Libraries (EAHIL)
Language
en, English
College/Research Centre
College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing
School
School of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy
Rights statement
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.