This paper illuminates two under-investigated, and often intersecting, frontline services accessed by unemployed people. It reports on the narratives of 32 Australian service providers working in emergency relief or employment services during 2012, including perceptions of clients’ presenting issues and problems, and rationale for intervention. Workers tended to use reductionist and individualistic terms to describe complex client issues suggesting self-motivation and personal responsibility were key to gaining employment or alleviating poverty. Clients were often viewed as having the power to change their circumstances, while workers appeared unaware of their positional power and drew from dominant conservative discourse about welfarism and unemployment to fortify their compliance requirements. The findings are discussed in relation to service delivery and reform.
History
Journal title
Australian Social Work
Volume
69
Issue
3
Pagination
297-310
Publisher
Routledge
Language
en, English
College/Research Centre
Faculty of Education and Arts
School
School of Humanities and Social Science
Rights statement
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Australian Social Work on 18/08/2015, available online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10.1080/0312407X.2015.1049627