posted on 2025-05-10, 16:25authored byBrenda HappellBrenda Happell, Chris Platania-Phung, Jerry Allon, Mari Lahti, Jarmo Pulli, Annaliina Vatula, Heikki Ellilä, Martha Griffin, Siobhan Russell, Liam MacGabhann, Einar Bjornsson, Pall Biering, Brett Scholz, Julia Bocking, Aine Horgan, Fionnuala Manning, Rory Doody, Elisabeth Hals, Arild Granerud, Kornelius Jan van der Vaart
Purpose: Evaluate the validity of the Opening Minds Scale (OMS) for nursing students via Rasch models and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Design and methods: Undergraduate nursing student responses to OMS (n = 423). Validity was evaluated via CFA and Rasch analysis. Findings: CFA results were strongest for a three-factor 13-item version of OMS. Rasch modeling supported sound properties for two of three scales. Internal reliabilities ranged between 0.6 and 0.7. Practice implications: OMS has potential as a valid measure for stigma research and antistigma program evaluation. Rasch analysis suggest it is inappropriate to use a total OMS score for nursing student populations.
History
Journal title
Perspectives in Psychiatric Care
Volume
55
Issue
4
Pagination
661-666
Publisher
Wiley-Blackwell
Language
en, English
College/Research Centre
Faculty of Health and Medicine
School
School of Nursing and Midwifery
Rights statement
This is the peer reviewed version of above article, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/ppc.12393. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.