Open Research Newcastle
Browse

Assessment of the Opening Minds Scale for use with nursing students

Download (320.35 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2025-05-10, 16:25 authored by Brenda HappellBrenda Happell, Chris Platania-Phung, Jerry Allon, Mari Lahti, Jarmo Pulli, Annaliina Vatula, Heikki Ellilä, Martha Griffin, Siobhan Russell, Liam MacGabhann, Einar Bjornsson, Pall Biering, Brett Scholz, Julia Bocking, Aine Horgan, Fionnuala Manning, Rory Doody, Elisabeth Hals, Arild Granerud, Kornelius Jan van der Vaart
Purpose: Evaluate the validity of the Opening Minds Scale (OMS) for nursing students via Rasch models and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Design and methods: Undergraduate nursing student responses to OMS (n = 423). Validity was evaluated via CFA and Rasch analysis. Findings: CFA results were strongest for a three-factor 13-item version of OMS. Rasch modeling supported sound properties for two of three scales. Internal reliabilities ranged between 0.6 and 0.7. Practice implications: OMS has potential as a valid measure for stigma research and antistigma program evaluation. Rasch analysis suggest it is inappropriate to use a total OMS score for nursing student populations.

History

Journal title

Perspectives in Psychiatric Care

Volume

55

Issue

4

Pagination

661-666

Publisher

Wiley-Blackwell

Language

  • en, English

College/Research Centre

Faculty of Health and Medicine

School

School of Nursing and Midwifery

Rights statement

This is the peer reviewed version of above article, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/ppc.12393. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.

Usage metrics

    Publications

    Categories

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC