Open Research Newcastle
Browse

A cross-national study to objectively evaluate the quality of diverse simulation approaches for undergraduate nursing students

Download (446.78 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2025-05-09, 15:26 authored by Ashley KableAshley Kable, Tracy L. Levett-Jones, Carol Arthur, Kerry Reid-Searl, Melanie Humphreys, Sara Morris, Pauline Walsh, Nicola J. Witton
The aim of this paper is to report the results of a cross-national study that evaluated a range of simulation sessions using an observation schedule developed from evidence-based quality indicators. Observational data were collected from 17 simulation sessions conducted for undergraduate nursing students at three universities in Australia and the United Kingdom. The observation schedule contained 27 questions that rated simulation quality. Data were collected by direct observation and from video recordings of the simulation sessions. Results indicated that the highest quality scores were for provision of learning objectives prior to the simulation session (90%) and debriefing (72%). Student preparatiosn and orientation (67%) and perceived realism and fidelity (67%) were scored lower than other components of the simulation sessions. This observational study proved to be an effective strategy to identify areas of strength and those needing further development to improve simulation sessions.

History

Journal title

Nurse Education in Practice

Volume

28

Issue

January

Pagination

248-256

Publisher

Churchill Livingstone

Language

  • en, English

College/Research Centre

Faculty of Health and Medicine

School

School of Nursing and Midwifery

Rights statement

© 2018. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Usage metrics

    Publications

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC